CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT – Gallbladder Removal Malpractice

This case highlights the devastating consequences of surgical errors and underscores the importance of seeking a qualified Missouri medical malpractice lawyer if you suspect you or a loved one has been a victim of medical negligence. While patient details remain confidential, this medical malpractice case involving a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (lap-choli) gone wrong serves as a cautionary tale for those considering a personal injury lawsuit in Missouri.

Key Points of Contention: Understanding Surgical Negligence in Missouri

• Misidentification of Anatomical Structures:
  • The surgeon allegedly clipped and transected the common bile duct (CBD), mistaking it for the cystic duct or artery, leading to severe personal injury.
  • Expert testimony suggests the surgeon never visualized the cystic duct, misidentifying the CBD instead.
  • Post-operative imaging showing surgical clips on the CBD indicates it was intentionally clipped before being cut, a critical point in a Missouri medical malpractice case.
• Failure to Obtain the Critical View of Safety (CVS):
  • The surgeon allegedly used the higher-risk infundibular approach instead of the safer CVS, which requires complete dissection and positive identification of specific anatomical structures.
  • Medical literature and expert testimony support the CVS as the standard of care, highlighting the “error traps” of the infundibular approach. A Missouri personal injury attorney can help determine if a surgeon’s failure to follow protocol led to your injuries.
• Improper Conversion to Open Procedure:
  • The surgeon allegedly converted to an open procedure after encountering significant complications, rather than before, potentially causing further unnecessary harm. This is a key factor in establishing negligence in a personal injury claim.
• Inaccurate and Pre-Prepared Post-Operative Report:
  • The surgeon’s post-operative report was allegedly prepared before the surgery and contained false information, including claims of “minimal” blood loss and “0 complications.” This raises serious concerns about proper medical documentation, crucial in any Missouri medical malpractice lawsuit.
• Expert Testimony: Building a Strong Personal Injury Case in Missouri
  • Expert testimony confirmed the complete transection of the CBD and reinforced the correct surgical procedures, highlighting the dangers of the methods used by the defendant. A skilled Missouri medical malpractice lawyer understands the importance of expert testimony in building a strong case.

Implications: Seeking Compensation for Personal Injury in Missouri

This case emphasizes the importance of:

• Accurate anatomical identification during surgery.
• Adherence to established safety protocols, such as the CVS.
• Accurate and timely medical documentation.
• Proper decision making regarding conversion from laparoscopic to open procedures.

If you believe you’ve been injured due to medical negligence, consult with a Missouri personal injury attorney to understand your rights and options for seeking compensation.